Top 5 Longest Partnerships in Cricket with detail
Here are the top 5 longest partnerships in Test cricket, along with details about the players, the teams, the runs scored, and the venue of each partnership.
Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene (Sri Lanka):
- Partnership Runs: 624 runs
- Teams: Sri Lanka vs. South Africa
- Venue: Sinhalese Sports Club Ground, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Date: July 27-29, 2006
This partnership between two Sri Lankan legends is the highest partnership in Test cricket history. It came against South Africa and played a crucial role in Sri Lanka's dominant performance in the match.
Sanath Jayasuriya and Roshan Mahanama (Sri Lanka):
- Partnership Runs: 576 runs
- Teams: Sri Lanka vs. India
- Venue: R. Premadasa Stadium, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Date: August 2-5, 1997
This partnership also involved Sri Lankan players and is the second-highest partnership in Test cricket history. It was instrumental in Sri Lanka's big total in the match.
Andrew Jones and Martin Crowe (New Zealand):
- Partnership Runs: 467 runs
- Teams: New Zealand vs. Sri Lanka
- Venue: Basin Reserve, Wellington, New Zealand
- Date: February 10-13, 1991
This partnership is the highest for New Zealand and the third-highest in Test cricket history. It helped New Zealand secure a strong position in the match.
Bill Ponsford and Don Bradman (Australia):
- Partnership Runs: 451 runs
- Teams: Australia vs. England
- Venue: Kennington Oval, London, England
- Date: August 18-22, 1934
This historic partnership between Australian legends Ponsford and Bradman remains one of the most iconic partnerships in Test cricket. It played a significant role in Australia's success in the match.
Hanif Mohammad and Imtiaz Ahmed (Pakistan):
- Partnership Runs: 437 runs
- Teams: Pakistan vs. New Zealand
- Venue: Seddon Park, Hamilton, New Zealand
- Date: January 17-20, 1953
This partnership between Pakistani batsmen Hanif Mohammad and Imtiaz Ahmed is the fifth-highest partnership in Test cricket history. It contributed to Pakistan's competitive performance in the match.
0 Comments